Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on March 5, 2010
The V-shaped recovery crowd and their allies in the Whitehouse are desperate to see the job growth that they predicted would occur by the first quarter to materialize. Instead, the Labor Department reported the U.S. lost another 36,000 net jobs in February despite counting the hiring of 15,000 Census workers who will be let go this summer. Many analysts are touting that the snow storms actually masked tens of thousands of jobs and in fact we probably created jobs in February. The only problem is the Labor Department itself disputes this analysis. Here is the quote from today’s unemployment report “In order for severe weather conditions to reduce the estimate of payroll employment, employees have to be off for an entire pay period and not be paid for the time missed. About half of all workers in the payroll survey have a 2-week, semi-monthly, or monthly pay period. Workers who received pay for any part of the reference pay period, even one hour, are counted in the February pay- roll employment figures. While some persons may have been off payrolls during the survey reference period, some industries, such as those dealing with cleanup and repair activities, may have added workers.” Also, we must consider that while a company that closed a day for snow couldn’t hire anybody, they also couldn’t fire anybody. The bottom line is we really didn’t create any jobs in February. So don’t fall for Larry Summer’s snow job on snow holding back job creation in February. He needs to be held accountable for why the policies he is championing to restore jobs to the economy aren’t creating any net jobs. Almost everyone believes the minimalist $15 billion jobs bill will only create a minimal amount of jobs. The ADP unemployment report methodology wasn’t impacted by the snow and there numbers for a loss of 22,ooo private sector jobs in February closely corresponds with the official unemployment report from the Department of Labor.
In case you missed it Gallup interviewed over 20,000 people in late January and stated the unemployment and underemployment rate (those working part-time for economic reasons who need a full-time job) was 19.9%. The U-6 rate in February rose back to 16.8%. This is the real unemployment rate. Basically, according to Gallup one in five Americans aged 18 and older who want a full-time job are unable to find one. Additionally, Gallup reported that the unemployed/underemployed spend an average of $48 per day compared to the employed who spend $75 per day. This means the 30 million people without a full-time job are spending $10,000 per year less than those with full-time jobs. This represents a massive drag on consumer spending in the U.S.
It is time for the President to step forward and acknowledge his administration underestimated the severity of the economic downturn and that Washington needs to do much more to find jobs for the unemployed. Yet not only is the Whitehouse not acknowledging that our problems are worse than we initially thought, they are trapped in political spin and are trying to portray today’s loss of jobs as ”better than expected.” It is not better than what was expected only a few weeks ago before the snow. In fact the snow argument only appeared in the last week to mask the weakness in the unemployment report. We will not find jobs for all of the unemployed/underemployed if we continue to deny that the steps taken so far were not enough. President Obama, we need a one trillion dollar jobs bill to jump start the economy. Please quit talking about the need for deficit reduction and please start talking about the need for job creation. Hoover tried to limit deficit spending in 1931 and look where that got us, and him. No economist believes that a combination of both spending cuts and tax increases like those being forced on Greece, and on our States, will lead to job creation. My son goes to The University of Texas. UT has been told by the Texas Governor they have to cut 5% of their budget, which equates to cutting $100 million. America can do better than this. We will find the next FDR in either 2012, 2016, or in 2020. But we would be better off if we found him in the Whitehouse in 2010.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on February 8, 2010
The Dow Jones closed below 10,000 as investors are becoming increasingly nervous about the ability of governments to step forward and solve the economic crisis. Global economies cannot revive unless significant amounts of additional government spending continue to take the place of private sector spending. However, governments cannot cut deficits and support the global economy with higher spending at the same time. The crisis surrounding the debts and deficits of Greece, Spain, and Portugal expose Europe as leaderless and rudderless. Now is not the time to ask Greece, Spain, and Portugal to accept fiscal austerity and more economic pain. Yet that is exactly what Europe’s leaders are doing. The U.S. remains equally leaderless and rudderless as the states are asked to swallow the same type of bitter fiscal austerity pill by the Whitehouse and the Congress. Global governments appear frozen and incapable of stepping up and meeting the challenges that face us. Confidence is always fragile. No one in a leadership position is capable of putting Humpty Dumpty back together again. Money is heading back under the mattress. Let’s be clear, nothing has been fixed. The credit markets remain broken. Sleight of hand statistics like those used in the unemployment report are not working any more. People are waking up and realizing that the unemployment rate went down to 9.7% because we have thrown more workers out of the want to work bad enough category, not because we actually created jobs. The Labor Department reported we have the same number of Jobs in January as we did in November, yet the unemployment rate dropped from 10% to 9.7% despite population growth. Weekly unemployment claims started rising again before the loss of confidence even swept the markets. Now there is a very good chance the momentum to fire more workers will gather steam.
Our country has over 6 million people that have been out of work for over 6 months. Where is the plan to put all of them, that’s right all of them, back to work? Cutting taxes isn’t going to do it. A feeble $100 billion jobs bill isn’t going to do it. Faith in the markets isn’t going to do it. We need to see a real plan. So far no leader in Washington has put forward a comprehensive plan to put America back to work.
In 1931 there was false optimism the economy stabilized and the worst was over, then the next big leg down in the economy hit and eventually drove the unemployment rate to 25% in 1933. It appears the next leg down in our economy has begun. The global economy cannot be sustained without significant increases in global government spending. Spending cannot continue without large deficits. The solution is to print money to reduce government debts and increase government spending at the same time. No leader is currently advocating this. Both the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve have naively backed away from quantitative easing. What our leaders fail to see is first they came for the Gypsies, then they came for the Jews, then they came for us. First the deficit hawks are coming for Southern Europe, then…
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on February 4, 2010
Today the Bank of England announced they are ending their quantitative easing program for the time being. They will no longer print money and buy their own government bonds. The Federal Reserve has already announced they will stop printing money and purchasing mortgages. The Japanese Central Bank remains lost in translation. The ECB remains clueless. This week the Australian Central Bank back-pedaled and backed off raising interest rates, which shocked the markets since all 20 analysts predicted they would continue raising interest rates. The Australians came to their senses and stopped the madness. It is only a matter of time before the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Japanese Central Bank, and yes even the European Central Bank begin to aggressively print money to stop the debt-induced deflationary depression in its tracks. How long it takes and how much more global unemployment pain will be endured before they come to their senses is anybody’s guess. There is no doubt this will happen, for there is no other way out. The unemployment crisis, which will be highlighted by the U.S. unemployment report tomorrow, is a global crisis. Unemployment rates in Spain are officially 19%, which are Great Depression levels. Yet the ECB and the bond vigilantes are demanding that Spain join Greece and initiate significant cutbacks in government spending including firing more government workers and cutting wages. Even Herbert Hoover increased federal government spending in the 1930’s, though not by much. Cutting government spending will lead to a decline in aggregate demand which will further depress the global economy leading to more firings of private sector workers. The time for euphemisms like “layoffs” is over. Workers are being told to hit the streets. The global economy is suffering from a lack of demand due to ridiculously tight credit conditions for consumers and small businesses. Tight credit conditions have once again spread to corporate borrowers and now they are being inflicted on sovereign nations. The world is still in the midst of global deleveraging because there is simply not enough money in the world to support all of the debts.
The nations in the euro will either share their debts or they will be forced to break the euro up and return to their own currencies. My advice to the Europeans is to have all 15 nations in the euro guarantee the debts of all other 15 nations, true monetary integration. While this was not part of their original treaty it either gets added now or they can kiss the euro goodbye. Then, the ECB should embark on an aggressive quantitative easing program to make sure the debts do not require cutbacks in government services and do not fall on the backs of the taxpayers. The only risk would be the euro might depreciate against other currencies. If this happened it would only make European exports much more competitive improving their balance of trade.
What is needed now is global leadership, sadly it is lacking. A money printing solution to the economic crisis exists and yet politicians are cowered by false prophets preaching the limits of money creation and the anachronistic worship of gold. Those concerned about high unemployment rates need to understand those rates will trend higher and higher unless and until the world central banks come to their senses and re-inflate the money supply. Helicopter Ben needs to rev up the engines or forever sacrifice his reputation as having avoided another Great Depression. In order to solve a crisis you have to understand it first.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on February 1, 2010
President Obama’s 2010 budget is not only a jobs killer, it is heartless. The military has a motto that no man should be left behind. If a comrade in arms falls, then you do everything possible to save them. Apparently this motto does not extend to the unemployed. If they fall they are on their own, just as if they were in the streets of Pamplona running with the bulls. The President’s new budget cuts unemployment benefits by $75 billion, which is almost a 50% reduction. Yet the Whitehouse estimates the unemployment rate will only fall to 9.8% by the end of 2010. The only explanation is the President is willing to let unemployment benefits run out for those who are unable to find work. This despite the fact that there is still only one job opening in America for every six applicants. Furthermore, the budget cuts over $10 billion from federal construction projects ranging from the military to schools. Construction spending in the U.S. was reported to fall by 1.2% for the second month in a row. Construction projects equals jobs. Cutting construction projects is equivalent to cutting construction jobs. Furthermore, unbelievably the budget cuts Medicaid expenditures by more than 10%, or $33 billion. Surely the President is not in favor of cutting health care to the poor. The only explanation is the President is willing to let the states pick up more of the tab for Medicaid. Never mind of course that the states are broke and they cannot print money like the federal government.
The federal budget deficit faces a paradox. There is no way to cut the deficit unless spending is cut. Alternatively, there is no way to significantly raise tax revenues unless unemployment rates are significantly lowered and people are put back to work. So there are two paths to lowering the deficit; by cutting spending or by putting people back to work. Growing the econ0my will benefit both the employed and the unemployed. Cutting federal spending will not benefit the unemployed and it will not benefit anyone else. It will ultimately raise the taxes of those still working while austerity measures are put into place.
Unemployment is the number one issue in America, not deficit reduction. People want and need jobs. The President will not succeed by rhetorically expressing a concern for the unemployed while deploying policies that do not create jobs. Yes, the President’s budget includes $100 billion worth of job creation measures. But consider that we have lost several million jobs since the $787 billion stimulus bill was enacted. If we lost several million jobs spending several hundred billion dollars, then is it plausible we will create millions of jobs if we simply spend $100 billion more? What we need is a one trillion dollar jobs bill that includes construction spending and aid to the states. Instead, we get not only a cut back in unemployment benefits but a cutback in federal construction spending and a cutback in Medicaid spending, which means a cutback to the states. Both FDR and Reagan focused on economic growth. They arguably had the most successful Presidencies of the 20th Century. Herbert Hoover focused on the limitations of the federal government during an economic crisis and he arguably had the least successful Presidency of the 20th century. It’s not that Hoover didn’t try. He didn’t try hard enough. History will only judge President Obama by the outcomes of his Presidency, not his intentions. Like Hoover he will be remembered by whether or not he created jobs, not by whether or not he cut the deficit.
T
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on January 10, 2010
Sometimes it is better to sit back and think rather than to react. My initial reaction was to pound the table on how the latest unemployment report is showing the job situation to be much weaker than the economists and the Obama Administration have led us to believe. The talk of an improving trend in job losses has become so acceptable that the Administration is out taking credit for losing only 85,000 jobs in December and stating that it is a 90% improvement over peak monthly job losses. My reflex is to point out that in order to keep a 10% unemployment rate we had to drop another 600,000 plus people out of the labor force. Despite the stimulus bill aimed at supporting state budgets we lost another 21,000 government jobs. I also wanted to point out that when we hire 1.2 million census workers between now and May, only to let them go by November, we will be temporarily understating the true state of the unemployment situation. The reality is this unemployment report showed no signs that job creation is on the horizon, unless of course you are looking for temporary work without benefits. Will the new census workers receive health insurance, or a pension, or a sense of permanency? But giving a blow by blow description of what is happening in the economic game can cause one to fail to see the forest for the trees. It is the methods we are using to keep the economic game stats that are deluding us into thinking we are better off than we really are. We need an economist of stature to step forward and say we need to rewrite the way we measure the outcome of the game.
Since the beginning of 2008 we have dropped 1 million people out of the labor force. We started 2008 by saying 154 million Americans wanted a full-time job and we ended 2009 by saying only 153 million people wanted a full-time job. We need to add 125,000 workers per month to account for a 1% growth in population. This means we have 3 million more people looking for a full-time job at the end of 2009 than at the beginning of 2008. Effectively we have cut 4 million people out of the labor force because they have become too discouraged to get turned down for the hundredth time. If we add these workers back in then the number of people unemployed would be nearing 20 million and the unemployment rate would be 12.3%. While it may have made sense to assume that if someone wasn’t aggressively looking for work in a vibrant economy that person didn’t want a job bad enough to be counted as officially unemployed, it makes no sense to use the same criteria in a depressed economy when jobs simply are not available and the number of long-term unemployed breaks a new record month after month after month. When they counted the unemployed during the Great Depression they didn’t ask whether or not you had mailed out three resumes in the last three weeks.
Undercounting our unemployed leads us to policy errors. The Obama Administration would be not be so complacent to claim the GDP measured recession is over and we are showing a positive trend in job losses if the nightly news reported the official unemployment rate is now up to 12.3%, a level not seen since the Great Depression. We are hiding our soup lines with food stamps. Over 6 million people say the only income they have is food stamps. They couldn’t eat without them. When the news media and the economic pundits keep pushing the lie that we have avoided another Great Depression they are only prolonging the solutions and open the door to who knows what when it all hits the fan. Sweeping the truth under the rug is only going to lead to more pain and even larger outrage. Are we sure we can control the fury?
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on January 6, 2010
The economic crisis is best thought of as a bursting construction bubble in both residential and commercial properties. For perspective on when we get out of this consider that after the bursting of the NASDAQ bubble that index still trades ten years later for less than half of its all-time highs. It will take a generation or longer for residential and commercial properties to approach the high prices they reached after the height of the no credit, no job, no money down, no worries mate you got a McMansion mania. In November construction spending fell again and is now down 13% from November of 2008. Homes sales slowed markedly in November once the first time home buyers tax credit expired for the first time. Millions of more foreclosures are on the way. On the commercial side there is a glut of empty retail space, office space, hotel space, and warehouse space. And unlike the tech companies that took it on the chin ten years ago it is highly unlikely new innovations will render any of these properties obsolete any time soon and in need of replacement to revive the construction industry. Spain, Ireland, and a host of others headlined by Dubai are also massively overbuilt. Many of the barely more than interest only mortgages backing these overpriced properties have not been written down by the Zombie banks. After all why not extend and pretend instead of fix and lend as long as the bonuses keep coming.
Unlike the NASDAQ bubble there are a lot more jobs on the line this time. Many of these jobs will be gone for a generation or more because the buildings are not going anywhere. When we think about bringing the 10% unemployment rate down we need to realize the jobs lost in construction are not returning. The construction industry includes a lot more than carpenters and electricians. It includes mortgage bankers and lawyers, realtors, architects, interior designers, and manufacturers of building materials. It also includes peripheral jobs making pick-up trucks and running a lunch wagon. Most of these jobs are very good paying jobs and even if we find another job for the laid off worker the new job will probably pay half of what they were making in the construction industry. This of course impacts consumer spending and will cost jobs in a host of other industries including retail and food service.
The Obama Administration is failing to provide the big bang stimulus programs needed to shock and awe the economy back to stability. This is unforgivable and Geithner and Summers need to go. Construction spending is down 13% from a year ago and falling and these knuckleheads are trying to spin us that the economy is growing again. But what is much more important is the economic GDP worshipping technocrats President Obama has surrounded himself with do not grasp the depths of our economic despair and are devoid of the vision thing. We need somebody in Washington who can see the dilemma our nation has fallen into. Exactly how are we going to redeploy the army of well paid construction workers? Do where tear down older obsolete buildings to keep the construction industry thriving? Do we innovate a new industry to absorb the millions of unemployed construction workers and at what pay-scale? Or do we alter our social contract and make retirement at earlier ages more palatable to open up jobs for younger workers? Personally I believe we should employ all three strategies simultaneously. Is the Obama Administration even discussing the need to discuss a strategy?
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on December 29, 2009
The objective of this blog is to advocate for the unemployed and find a macro-solution to returning those willing and able to work to decent jobs. I am strategically using a three-pronged approach which includes analyzing the most recent economic reports to gain insights into the outlook for unemployment, putting forth creative solutions that can improve economic growth, and holding Congress and the current Presidential Administration’s feet to the fire to prod them to do all they can to improve the potential for the unemployed to find meaningful full-time work. Most of the time it seems my message falls on deaf ears. Yet I know there are many out there like me who feel passionately about finding a way to restore the American dream to so many families who are suffering. I think we all know someone who is unemployed through no fault of their own. Most of us couldn’t say that two years ago. Yesterday I found a visual image of the pain many of these people feel when I saw the movie Up in the Air. In the movie George Clooney works for a firm that professionally fires people for large employers. It shows person after person being confronted with the horror of losing their job. These individuals feel dismayed, betrayed, and frightened for their family’s economic future. Since I am not a brilliant writer of prose I will simply highly recommend you see this movie to heighten your insight into the number one tragedy facing Americans: unemployment.
In the movie George Clooney’s character spends a lot of time flying. Unfortunately, the 2010 outlook for the unemployed is that they will remain grounded. There is no wind coming from Washington to lift their wings. Economic growth remains anemic and yet Congress and Administration are more concerned about the federal budget deficit than they are with providing enough stimuli to the economy to return the unemployed to work. And the Federal Reserve actually seems intent on ending quantitative easing in the near term. They all appear to believe the economy will magically return to growth on its own despite extremely tight credit conditions and an over built housing market. Sadly, they also appear content with the status quo and the concept that some pain now is necessary to provide creative destruction. Herbert Hoover and his advisers felt the same way and believed the same things.
President Obama has the power to make a real difference in the lives of the unemployed. He can lead our nation out of this economic morass and return the legions of the unemployed to dignified jobs. But he has to feel passionate about the issue. It can not be just another thing on his to do list. He needs to feel the weight of the unemployed on his shoulders. He needs to feel their pain. If he took on the greatest challenge of his Presidency with passion he would see success transcends political partisanship, personal friendship, and his pre-conceived notions about what his Presidency would be about. It is about jobs whether or not he is willing to rise to the challenge. If he is serious he will quit playing the blame game, he will fire Summers and Geithner, and he will jettison his notions about what America cannot do. Rather than preaching to us about the limits of government he will extol the wonders of the American spirit. He will ask employers to hire people. He will ask employers how the federal government can ease their burden to put people back to work. He will ask for Wall Street to fund real innovation rather than financial gimmickry. It starts with finding a new Presidential adviser unlike Larry Summers who believes the greatest economic innovations in America include the electric light bulb, the telephone, and the computer and not generally accepted accounting principles.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on December 16, 2009
The Bernanke led Fed is divided. Some want to render more aid to the economy now. Others wish to withdraw support and head off future inflation. Both sides have agreed in a grand bargain to wait for more data and to wait until they have to make a real decision. The deadline is March 2010 when the current round of quantitative easing is scheduled to end. That is when the Fed is scheduled to end its purchases of Agency debt and of Agency issued mortgages. Until then they neither have to end or extend quantitative easing. The Fed is watching unemployment and capacity utilization. Between now and the end of March the private sector and the state governments will shed more jobs. The predictions by the leading economists are for the real economy to begin to add private sector jobs in the first quarter of 2010. It’s not going to happen. What is going to happen is the federal government will add almost one million temporary jobs to work on the 2010 census. But all of these jobs will end at the end of 2010. The Fed needs to back these jobs out of the next few unemployment reports to get a clear picture of where the economy is heading. Otherwise they may make a decision based on a false reading of economic vitality.
The CPI report showed the core rate of inflation is currently zero. This in spite of the dollar declining gold led rise in November oil prices. That trend has already reversed and the dollar has bottomed in the near term. It’s not because the U.S. is doing so much better. It’s because the veil has been lifted on the euro and the reality of the economic calamity facing countries like Greece, Spain, and Ireland has been laid bare. The CPI reports will soon trend negative. It is only the cold winter that is holding keeping the price of oil from collapsing. It is certainly not economic activity.
The Fed is definitely behind the curve. But it is not the inflation curve they are behind, it is the deflation curve. Prices will keep falling in housing and real goods in search of demand. The banks continue to tighten credit. The Obama Administration has chosen politics over economic substance in allowing Bank of America, Citi Group, and Wells Fargo to exit the Tarp. Despite raising money the capital ratios of all three of these firms fell when the Treasury redeemed its preferred stock. The deleveraging continues and even fewer loans will be lent to consumers and small businesses in 2010, despite the pleas from the President. The Fed needs to look at the big picture and needs to quit waiting and start printing more money ASAP. Manufacturing activity is already slowing down in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. And Christmas sales at the retail level are looking to be weaker than expected. Come January the false dawn of economic revitalization will become self evident and the Fed’s hesitancy will cost it valuable points in confidence. If the Fed had moved today to up their quantitative easing program businesses may have had the confidence to keep workers on and perhaps even to attempt to expand. But because the Fed is blinking employers will blink too. Unfortunately the Obama Administration is not only blinking on job creation, they are blind.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on December 13, 2009
The readings on the economy are tricking policy makers into thinking the economy has bottomed and a slow recovery is under way. But this false optimism is based on misreading the tea leaves. The recent readings on the economy such as GDP, the November unemployment rate, and the November retail sales report are signaling to policy makers that all is calm. They are misinterpreting this to mean the coast is clear. In fact the economic reports are flawed and are disguising the second half of the storm that will soon hit in full force driving the economy down in what has come to be known as a double dip. The growth in third quarter GDP benefited almost exclusively from an auto industry that had practically shut down in the second quarter and got a boost from cash for clunkers. The November unemployment report was a rogue number not supported by any other measure of the nation’s unemployment rate. Finally, the growth in retail sales is based on higher gasoline prices and not on an increase in demand for more gallons of gasoline. Imports of oil in the U.S. have declined by over 1 million barrels versus a year ago. Ironically the lack of demand for imported oil is considered a sign of economic growth in the GDP report, go figure. Reality will soon bite hard as the credit collapse enters phase II tomorrow.
Dubai is under the gun and will probably allow Dubai World to default on $3.5 billion worth of bonds. This wake-up call has forced the rating agencies to stop seeing no evil and opening their eyes to the risks of the debt of some countries like Greece. These countries are not Zimbabwe, nor Iceland, and the problems they are facing are legion throughout the world. On the Main Street stage the big banks acknowledged they are shrinking their loan portfolios to small businesses and consumers in an attempt to deleverage. We enter 2010 in worse economic shape than we entered 2009.
How will the Obama Administration respond in an election year if the economy heads south? They have backed themselves into a corner by declaring the recession is over and by declaring every positive signal in the economy as a sign the failed stimulus bill is working. Does President Obama have the political courage to go back to Congress and say he and his team were wrong and the economy needs a lot more federal spending when he has been out preaching the virtues of deficit reduction ala Hoover in the middle of a depression? I hope so, but I doubt it. Instead I look for 2010 to be a year of significant political and social upheaval as rising unemployment frays the fabric of American society. There are rays of hope. Paul Krugman has kick-started the conversation about the benefits of the Fed printing money to lower unemployment. Additionally, Harry Reid has kick-started the conversation on lowering the eligibility age for Medicare. The genie is out of the bottle on both of these once taboo subjects. Printing money, lowering the retirement age, and fixing the banks for good are the three keys to ending the depression. As they say two out of three ain’t bad.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on December 11, 2009
In this morning’s New York Times Paul Krugman called on Ben Bernanke to ratchet up the Federal Reserve’s efforts to create jobs by printing $2 trillion. Krugman says the economy needs to create 300,000 jobs per month for the next five years in order to create the 18 million jobs necessary to return to full employment. The Keynesian econonomist ruefully acknowledges the appetite for a full scale fiscal assault on the economic crisis doesn’t exist in Washington and he is turning to Bernanke and monetary policy as the nation’s best option to create jobs. Krugman states “the most specific, persuasive case I’ve seen for more Fed action comes from Joseph Gagnon, a former Fed staffer now at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Basing his analysis on the prior work of none other than Mr. Bernanke himself, in his previous incarnation as an economic researcher, Mr. Gagnon urges the Fed to expand credit by buying a further $2 trillion in assets. Such a program could do a lot to promote faster growth, while having hardly any downside.” While Joseph Gagnon is on the right track he underestimates the size and scale of quantitative easing necessary to end the credit crisis. Consider that Goldman Sach’s estimates that every $1.4 trillion worth of government securities the Fed purchases is equivalent to lowering the Fed Funds rate by 1%. Goldman further estimated the Fed Funds rate needs to be lowered another 6% in order for monetary policy to have enough teeth to get the economy moving again. The Goldman study estimates the Fed needs to print $8.4 trillion.
While I think Mr. Gagnon’s estimate is way too low and that Goldman’s estimates are also too low I am thrilled that Professor Krugman has kick-started the debate about why isn’t the Fed printing more money and just how much money does the Fed need to print. My own estimate is we should start with $10 trillion, though it will probably take $20 trillion, and virtually eliminate all of the outstanding U.S. Treasuries. This shock and awe strategy would restore confidence because the federal government would be almost debt free. It would also mean our President wouldn’t have to go to Asia and bow down before his bankers. And, it would free the Congress from concerns about the deficit allowing them to send the states the estimated $350 billion they will need over the next two years to close their budget deficits.
Imagine a world where the too-big-to-fail-too-yet-too-broke-to-lend-banks have no risk free Treasuries to invest in and are forced out on the risk curve with no option but to lend again? It is up to the Fed to take the “hide the money under the mattress” Treasury bonds away from the institutions. We have seen several Treasury auctions this month where the winning bidders accepted zero interest just to know their money was safe. One auction had demand for over five times the amount of Treasuries auctioned even though there was no interest to be earned. If I ran an institution I wouldn’t want my money in a maybe too big to fail bank, or in Dubai or Greece either. For those worried about the dollar if the Fed takes the plunge you can bet the Japanese and the Brits will be quick to follow. We are in a global debt-induced deflationary depression and it is up to the U.S. to lead the way out. Mr. Bernanke, to whom much is given, much is required.
