Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on March 1, 2010
This man is now my hero. He is the first highly respected financial commentator to recognize the seriousness of the current debt-induced deflationary depression. At risk to his reputation he has manned-up and called on Ben Bernanke to resume quantitative easing. When it comes to quantitative easing ignorance reigns. Many people have left comments on his column that the way to get out of debt is not to take on more debt. They are confusing borrowing and spending with printing. In the U.S. quantitative easing involves the Federal Reserve creating money out of thin air (printing) and purchasing assets. When the Fed purchases U.S. Treasury bonds with printed money the U.S. debt is reduced, not increased. This gives the federal government the leeway to maintain or increase spending without raising taxes or increasing the national debt. The economy desperately needs support. Increasing federal spending is the only way to stabilize the economy. As Evans-Pritchard points out the state of Illinois is running a $13 billion budget deficit on a total budget of $28 billion. Basically, Illinois needs to double state tax revenues or cut state spending in half. Many other states are in similar dire predicaments. The states cannot print, the Fed can. It must fulfill its duel mandate of price stability and full employment. Likewise, the federal government must fulfill its moral obligation to support the states.
Evans-Pritchard points out “the Fed’s Monetary Multiplier dropped to an all-time low of 0.809 last week.” Money is not circulating as it should. He also points out that “the M3 money supply has fallen at a 5.6pc rate since September.” Additionally, he highlights that ”the contraction of eurozone bank credit to firms accelerated to 2.7pc in January, while eurozone M3 fell by a further €55bn. Japan’s GDP deflator has dropped to a record low of -3pc. He claims “these are epic warning signals, with echoes of 1931. Yet the Fed has just raised the Discount Rate. It is winding up liquidity operations, and preparing to reverse QE, even though the housing market has tipped over again. New home sales fell 11pc in January to 309,000 units, the lowest since data began, and 24pc of mortgages are in negative equity.” He is so right!
Evans-Pritchard quotes the Bank of England’s Head Governor Mervyn King as saying “”I was struck by the mood at the G7, where several of the major economies around the world said quite openly that they were relying on external demand growth to generate growth. That can’t be true of everybody,” he said. We already know Larry Summers is advising President Obama to pursue just such a strategy. He believes we can spend less in America and save more, all the while growing our economy by selling more to others just like China does. As King states we can’t all run an import/export surplus. Meanwhile the British Pound is getting pounded by currency markets limiting the ability of the Bank of England to aggressively print money and revive its economy. It is up to Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve to aggressively print more money thereby providing cover to Britain, Japan, and the European Central Bank to pursue their own quantitative easing programs. Fed Vice Chair Donald Kohn retired today. This means President Obama now has three openings on the Fed. His appointments will decide the course the Fed ultimately takes. Hopefully someone in the Whitehouse is pointing out Evans-Pritchard’s comments to him.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on February 22, 2010
The Core CPI index was reported as minus .1%. This is the first time since 1982 the core rate has been negative. It won’t be the last. We are in store for many more negative Core CPI readings over the next couple of years. Housing costs in the form of rent and owner’s equivalent rent make up over 40% of the Core CPI rate. While the government should be using an estimate of actual home prices to calculate the cost of home ownership, it remains wedded to the concept of using owner’s equivalent rent which was introduced in 1983. While housing prices were falling dramatically for over 2 years, the CPI calculated the cost of home ownership as rising because rents were rising. Now the lag effect of the deep contraction in the housing market has spilled over to rents and rents are declining. Vacancy rates for apartments are now over 8%, and these units are having to compete with recent foreclosures and short sales purchased by investors and turned into rental units. Hence, the pressure on rents will remain relentless over the next couple of years unless there is a dramatic uptick in employment. Too many young men and women are graduating from college without the prospect of a full-time job that can cover their living expenses and they are being forced to move back home with Mom and Dad. Additionally, many pe0ple who are financially strapped are moving in with friends or relatives. The glut in housing will take a lot longer to work off than most experts expect.
The Core CPI is actually reflecting where we have been. But troubling to my mind is the more the government reports the country is experiencing deflation, then the more it will become a reinforcing self fulfilling prophecy. First of all many wage negotiations are tied to the CPI rate, as is Social Security. This will lower incomes. Additionally, as people see and perceive that prices are actually falling they will do the rational economic thing which is to delay purchases. Fewer purchases will lead to fewer jobs and fewer people capable of buying or renting a house. It is ironic that the Fed wanted to signal to the markets a return to normalcy by raising the discount rate last week only to have a negative print in the Core CPI rate bring in to question any attempt to tighten. It is only a matter of time before the Fed reverses and resumes its program of quantitative easing, just as it has been only a matter of time before the housing price declines would turn the Core CPI rate negative. Our country has too much debt, and now it has falling incomes to service that debt.
We are not alone. In fact we are legion. Most of Europe shares our fate. We now share Japan’s deflationary fate of the last 20 years. Japan sent a clear signal that when economic calamity hits the worst thing to do is to be too timid and then compound the error by propping up too-big-to-fail-too-broke-to-lend Zombie Banks. The history book on the shelf is always repeating itself….Waterloo. The Greek led euro crisis indicates deflation is inevitable in Europe as well. It also has sparked a significant rally in the dollar which is killing any hopes of an export led recovery. Message to Lawrence Summers, the whole world cannot adopt the Chinese model of selling four times as much as it buys from everyone else. There is an upside to the negative Core CPI rate. It will highlight the dramatic decline in the velocity of money and focus attention on the need for the Fed to print more money.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on February 8, 2010
The Dow Jones closed below 10,000 as investors are becoming increasingly nervous about the ability of governments to step forward and solve the economic crisis. Global economies cannot revive unless significant amounts of additional government spending continue to take the place of private sector spending. However, governments cannot cut deficits and support the global economy with higher spending at the same time. The crisis surrounding the debts and deficits of Greece, Spain, and Portugal expose Europe as leaderless and rudderless. Now is not the time to ask Greece, Spain, and Portugal to accept fiscal austerity and more economic pain. Yet that is exactly what Europe’s leaders are doing. The U.S. remains equally leaderless and rudderless as the states are asked to swallow the same type of bitter fiscal austerity pill by the Whitehouse and the Congress. Global governments appear frozen and incapable of stepping up and meeting the challenges that face us. Confidence is always fragile. No one in a leadership position is capable of putting Humpty Dumpty back together again. Money is heading back under the mattress. Let’s be clear, nothing has been fixed. The credit markets remain broken. Sleight of hand statistics like those used in the unemployment report are not working any more. People are waking up and realizing that the unemployment rate went down to 9.7% because we have thrown more workers out of the want to work bad enough category, not because we actually created jobs. The Labor Department reported we have the same number of Jobs in January as we did in November, yet the unemployment rate dropped from 10% to 9.7% despite population growth. Weekly unemployment claims started rising again before the loss of confidence even swept the markets. Now there is a very good chance the momentum to fire more workers will gather steam.
Our country has over 6 million people that have been out of work for over 6 months. Where is the plan to put all of them, that’s right all of them, back to work? Cutting taxes isn’t going to do it. A feeble $100 billion jobs bill isn’t going to do it. Faith in the markets isn’t going to do it. We need to see a real plan. So far no leader in Washington has put forward a comprehensive plan to put America back to work.
In 1931 there was false optimism the economy stabilized and the worst was over, then the next big leg down in the economy hit and eventually drove the unemployment rate to 25% in 1933. It appears the next leg down in our economy has begun. The global economy cannot be sustained without significant increases in global government spending. Spending cannot continue without large deficits. The solution is to print money to reduce government debts and increase government spending at the same time. No leader is currently advocating this. Both the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve have naively backed away from quantitative easing. What our leaders fail to see is first they came for the Gypsies, then they came for the Jews, then they came for us. First the deficit hawks are coming for Southern Europe, then…
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on February 4, 2010
Today the Bank of England announced they are ending their quantitative easing program for the time being. They will no longer print money and buy their own government bonds. The Federal Reserve has already announced they will stop printing money and purchasing mortgages. The Japanese Central Bank remains lost in translation. The ECB remains clueless. This week the Australian Central Bank back-pedaled and backed off raising interest rates, which shocked the markets since all 20 analysts predicted they would continue raising interest rates. The Australians came to their senses and stopped the madness. It is only a matter of time before the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the Japanese Central Bank, and yes even the European Central Bank begin to aggressively print money to stop the debt-induced deflationary depression in its tracks. How long it takes and how much more global unemployment pain will be endured before they come to their senses is anybody’s guess. There is no doubt this will happen, for there is no other way out. The unemployment crisis, which will be highlighted by the U.S. unemployment report tomorrow, is a global crisis. Unemployment rates in Spain are officially 19%, which are Great Depression levels. Yet the ECB and the bond vigilantes are demanding that Spain join Greece and initiate significant cutbacks in government spending including firing more government workers and cutting wages. Even Herbert Hoover increased federal government spending in the 1930’s, though not by much. Cutting government spending will lead to a decline in aggregate demand which will further depress the global economy leading to more firings of private sector workers. The time for euphemisms like “layoffs” is over. Workers are being told to hit the streets. The global economy is suffering from a lack of demand due to ridiculously tight credit conditions for consumers and small businesses. Tight credit conditions have once again spread to corporate borrowers and now they are being inflicted on sovereign nations. The world is still in the midst of global deleveraging because there is simply not enough money in the world to support all of the debts.
The nations in the euro will either share their debts or they will be forced to break the euro up and return to their own currencies. My advice to the Europeans is to have all 15 nations in the euro guarantee the debts of all other 15 nations, true monetary integration. While this was not part of their original treaty it either gets added now or they can kiss the euro goodbye. Then, the ECB should embark on an aggressive quantitative easing program to make sure the debts do not require cutbacks in government services and do not fall on the backs of the taxpayers. The only risk would be the euro might depreciate against other currencies. If this happened it would only make European exports much more competitive improving their balance of trade.
What is needed now is global leadership, sadly it is lacking. A money printing solution to the economic crisis exists and yet politicians are cowered by false prophets preaching the limits of money creation and the anachronistic worship of gold. Those concerned about high unemployment rates need to understand those rates will trend higher and higher unless and until the world central banks come to their senses and re-inflate the money supply. Helicopter Ben needs to rev up the engines or forever sacrifice his reputation as having avoided another Great Depression. In order to solve a crisis you have to understand it first.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on January 16, 2010
The Wall Street Journal is reporting the Federal Reserve plans to let most of their emergency measures expire as scheduled during the next two months. The Federal Reserve will remove guarantees for money market funds on February 1. They will also no longer make emergency loans to businesses that are having trouble accessing the commercial paper market. Most significantly, they will stop purchasing federal agency paper and mortgages at the end of March as scheduled. They will leave interest rates near zero until the economy demonstrates it has improved, and that the improvement is sustainable. Basically, the Fed plans to hide and watch for the remainder of 2010. Surprisingly, the Fed acknowledges that unemployment will probably remain stubbornly high for the foreseeable future. Yet there is a belief by the majority of Fed Governors that they have done enough and there is not much more they can do for the economy.
Balderdash! The Federal Reserve is charged with both price stability and full employment. By tacitly acknowledging we have an employment problem, but not using more of the tools at their disposal, the Fed is throwing in the Keynesian towel and adopting the creative destruction concepts of the Austrian School of Economics. If Ben Bernanke cannot move the Federal Reserve Board to fulfill its mandate, then he should not be confirmed to a second term. In a war, if you’re not winning, you fire the generals and bring in leaders who are willing to be more aggressive. Just because the Fed has done more than they ever have before doesn’t mean they have done enough, nor all that they can. Haiti is an example of an overwhelming crisis that requires a much bigger effort than what has been put forward so far. It doesn’t matter that what we are sending is more than we have ever sent to an island nation. It only matters that we do the job required of us to save those people, especially since we have the resources to do it sitting on U.S. bases. Like Haiti, the scale of our economic collapse is beyond the experience and the ability of our current economic rescue team to handle.
The Federal Reserve is now looking to the Whitehouse and the Congress to solve the economic Rubik’s Cube of finding a way out of the economic mess we find ourselves in. Unfortunately, massive quantitative easing is a big part of the way out and the Fed controls that. Doubly unfortunate is the fact that the Whitehouse and the Congress appear to be like deer in the economic headlights. Whatever came of the President’s job summit? Should Brown win in Massachusetts on Tuesday, then we could have gridlock right up until the mid-term elections in November. Even if the Democrat Coakley pulls it out, a near miss will call for recalibration. The situation in Haiti has clarified for me the problem with finding a solution. CNN reported that U.N. doctors left 25 patients in a field hospital unattended at night because of security fears. Yet CNN’s correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta, a hero, was able and willing to stay with the patients through the night to give them the best chance at survival. Because of his heroics all of the patients lived through the night. The command and control structure for the Haitian rescue mission is disjointed and broken. No one is really in charge and chaos reigns. The same problem has happened with the federal government’s response to the economic crisis. No one is in charge and no one is willing to be a hero. Everyone wants to stay with protocol and not stray to far from the orthodoxy. Therefore, they can always claim they did all they could and it wasn’t their fault. We need to throw caution to the wind and place a U.S. General in charge of the entire Haitian rescue operation, protocol be damned, and give that person full authority with unlimited resources to get the job done. Likewise, we need the President to use his existing authority to take ownership for providing a solution to the economic crisis. Instead, all we have now is bickering and debate and minimal efforts that are too meager to be effective.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on January 11, 2010
The consumer is getting the shaft in the Fed’s zero percent interest environment. Consumer credit fell by over $17 billion in November, which is part of the all-important Christmas shopping season. But what’s even more disturbing is the federal government is allowing the tax payer bailed out too-big-to-fail banks to get away with highway robbery. Big banks have raised the interest rates on credit card customers who are current on their bills up to 30% in some cases. We already have a huge problem in that many consumers cannot access credit. But many who can access credit are getting gouged. There is simply no acceptable reason for banks to be allowed to charge usurious interest rates when the Fed is letting them have money almost for free. The Fed’s policy of low interest rates is working to give the banks a chance to earn some income to cover their swept under the rug losses. However, the Fed’s low interest rate policy is failing to jump start the economy because the consumer is not seeing the low interest rates passed on to them, except for home mortgages. But most people cannot buy a new house because they can’t sell the house they live in and they cannot refinance because their current mortgage is underwater. Hence, this is having a limited impact on reviving the economy. The consumer’s inability to access affordable credit is paramount to a contraction in the money supply. Since the money supply is already contracting without factoring in the interest rate differential, the risk of persistent deflation rises daily.
The Federal Reserve needs to quit talking nonsense about an exit strategy and needs to get serious about printing a lot more money. There is no way the housing market will survive if mortgage interest rates rise further. That is all but certain to happen if the Fed ends its purchases of mortgages under its current quantitative easing program at the end of March. Nero fiddled while Rome burned. Right now the Obama Administration is fiddling while the consumer is being burned alive. It is up to Ben Bernanke to stand up and be counted. History calls.
It is also up to Congress to stand up and be counted. The recent “consumer protection” bill left a multi-month window for banks to abuse the little guy. And boys have they. Do they not realize that 70% of the U.S. economy is based on consumer spending? Do they not realize the consumer votes? Senator Dodd pushed this legislation through and now he has been pushed out. President Obama needs to call for change. He needs to call for change we can believe in. This economy is going no where if the consumer is not given a life-line, pronto.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on December 16, 2009
The Bernanke led Fed is divided. Some want to render more aid to the economy now. Others wish to withdraw support and head off future inflation. Both sides have agreed in a grand bargain to wait for more data and to wait until they have to make a real decision. The deadline is March 2010 when the current round of quantitative easing is scheduled to end. That is when the Fed is scheduled to end its purchases of Agency debt and of Agency issued mortgages. Until then they neither have to end or extend quantitative easing. The Fed is watching unemployment and capacity utilization. Between now and the end of March the private sector and the state governments will shed more jobs. The predictions by the leading economists are for the real economy to begin to add private sector jobs in the first quarter of 2010. It’s not going to happen. What is going to happen is the federal government will add almost one million temporary jobs to work on the 2010 census. But all of these jobs will end at the end of 2010. The Fed needs to back these jobs out of the next few unemployment reports to get a clear picture of where the economy is heading. Otherwise they may make a decision based on a false reading of economic vitality.
The CPI report showed the core rate of inflation is currently zero. This in spite of the dollar declining gold led rise in November oil prices. That trend has already reversed and the dollar has bottomed in the near term. It’s not because the U.S. is doing so much better. It’s because the veil has been lifted on the euro and the reality of the economic calamity facing countries like Greece, Spain, and Ireland has been laid bare. The CPI reports will soon trend negative. It is only the cold winter that is holding keeping the price of oil from collapsing. It is certainly not economic activity.
The Fed is definitely behind the curve. But it is not the inflation curve they are behind, it is the deflation curve. Prices will keep falling in housing and real goods in search of demand. The banks continue to tighten credit. The Obama Administration has chosen politics over economic substance in allowing Bank of America, Citi Group, and Wells Fargo to exit the Tarp. Despite raising money the capital ratios of all three of these firms fell when the Treasury redeemed its preferred stock. The deleveraging continues and even fewer loans will be lent to consumers and small businesses in 2010, despite the pleas from the President. The Fed needs to look at the big picture and needs to quit waiting and start printing more money ASAP. Manufacturing activity is already slowing down in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. And Christmas sales at the retail level are looking to be weaker than expected. Come January the false dawn of economic revitalization will become self evident and the Fed’s hesitancy will cost it valuable points in confidence. If the Fed had moved today to up their quantitative easing program businesses may have had the confidence to keep workers on and perhaps even to attempt to expand. But because the Fed is blinking employers will blink too. Unfortunately the Obama Administration is not only blinking on job creation, they are blind.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on December 11, 2009
In this morning’s New York Times Paul Krugman called on Ben Bernanke to ratchet up the Federal Reserve’s efforts to create jobs by printing $2 trillion. Krugman says the economy needs to create 300,000 jobs per month for the next five years in order to create the 18 million jobs necessary to return to full employment. The Keynesian econonomist ruefully acknowledges the appetite for a full scale fiscal assault on the economic crisis doesn’t exist in Washington and he is turning to Bernanke and monetary policy as the nation’s best option to create jobs. Krugman states “the most specific, persuasive case I’ve seen for more Fed action comes from Joseph Gagnon, a former Fed staffer now at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Basing his analysis on the prior work of none other than Mr. Bernanke himself, in his previous incarnation as an economic researcher, Mr. Gagnon urges the Fed to expand credit by buying a further $2 trillion in assets. Such a program could do a lot to promote faster growth, while having hardly any downside.” While Joseph Gagnon is on the right track he underestimates the size and scale of quantitative easing necessary to end the credit crisis. Consider that Goldman Sach’s estimates that every $1.4 trillion worth of government securities the Fed purchases is equivalent to lowering the Fed Funds rate by 1%. Goldman further estimated the Fed Funds rate needs to be lowered another 6% in order for monetary policy to have enough teeth to get the economy moving again. The Goldman study estimates the Fed needs to print $8.4 trillion.
While I think Mr. Gagnon’s estimate is way too low and that Goldman’s estimates are also too low I am thrilled that Professor Krugman has kick-started the debate about why isn’t the Fed printing more money and just how much money does the Fed need to print. My own estimate is we should start with $10 trillion, though it will probably take $20 trillion, and virtually eliminate all of the outstanding U.S. Treasuries. This shock and awe strategy would restore confidence because the federal government would be almost debt free. It would also mean our President wouldn’t have to go to Asia and bow down before his bankers. And, it would free the Congress from concerns about the deficit allowing them to send the states the estimated $350 billion they will need over the next two years to close their budget deficits.
Imagine a world where the too-big-to-fail-too-yet-too-broke-to-lend-banks have no risk free Treasuries to invest in and are forced out on the risk curve with no option but to lend again? It is up to the Fed to take the “hide the money under the mattress” Treasury bonds away from the institutions. We have seen several Treasury auctions this month where the winning bidders accepted zero interest just to know their money was safe. One auction had demand for over five times the amount of Treasuries auctioned even though there was no interest to be earned. If I ran an institution I wouldn’t want my money in a maybe too big to fail bank, or in Dubai or Greece either. For those worried about the dollar if the Fed takes the plunge you can bet the Japanese and the Brits will be quick to follow. We are in a global debt-induced deflationary depression and it is up to the U.S. to lead the way out. Mr. Bernanke, to whom much is given, much is required.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on December 5, 2009
Many people believe major government policy errors such as attempts to balance the budget in 1937 worsened the effects of the Great Depression. The reported drop in the November unemployment rate from 10.2% to 10% comes at a critical juncture and significantly raises the risk the Obama Administration and the Fed will repeat the past and fail to provide the additional stimulus and quantitative easing the economy desperately needs. The mistake they will make is to believe the headlines in the November unemployment report which showed a loss of only 11,000 jobs, a .2% improvement in the U-3 rate, and an upward revision for September and October is a sure sign the economy and the jobs picture are on the verge of rapidly improving. What they will miss is the November unemployment report is an outlier and its conclusion that the jobs picture and the economy are rapidly improving are not supported by all of the other measurements of the November unemployment picture. For starters, the unemployment report’s own measurement of those unemployed 27 weeks or longer rose by 293,000. Additionally, the Labor Department dropped another 100,000 discouraged people out of the workforce and failed to add any workers for population growth. How did we only lose 11,000 jobs when so many people joined the ranks of the long-term unemployed and so many others simply dropped out of the workforce? ADP measured a loss of 169,000 private sector jobs and TrimTabs measured a loss of 255,000 jobs. While the four week moving average of weekly jobless claims did improve to 481,250, it is still a number that normally portends 6 figure job losses. The November ISM Services number weakened and reported continued softness in employment. Plus, November retail sales were soft and gasoline usage remains moribund in the U.S.
The Christmas season is a time of big swings in employment as temps are added in October and November and big layoffs occur in January. The Department of Labor statisticians use seasonal adjustments to smooth out these wide up and down swings in employment. One of the big factors in the adjustment is recent trends in the same month in the preceding years. November is always a big hiring month. But last year the economy lost 610,000 jobs in November in the post Lehman collapse. This data-point lowered the normally expected November hiring trends in the seasonal adjustment factor and gave an artificial boost to the seasonally adjusted jobs number. Hence the report showed the biggest adjusted gain in temporary workers in 5 years even though retailers were preparing for and getting a lean Christmas selling season. The November jobs report has given a false positive reading on the economy.
The Obama Administration and the deficit hawks in Congress will now proclaim the policies put in place to date have been sufficient to revive the economy. Never mind those policies were supposed to keep unemployment from rising past 8% and it is now 10%. The same wonks that missed the severity of the economic downturn are missing it again. Similarly, the inflation hawks on the Fed will now eschew further quantitative easing measures and will crowd out weaker private borrowers in 2010. Because these leaders saw a mirage of hope they will ignore data indicating all is not well and will wait for the next mirage. Hooverism reigns in the Whitehouse and minimalist ideas like cash for caulkers is all we can expect from here on out.
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on November 20, 2009
Yesterday I took some time off from my day job and attended the Texas at the Table Hunger Summit. The room was filled with good hearted people interested in helping their fellow citizens who are less fortunate than they are. Speakers included deputy commissioners of the USDA and the Texas Agricultural Commissioner. There lofty goal is to virtually end hunger in America by 2015. The latest update from the USDA is that 36 million people are participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which we all know as food stamps. Up to 49 million people reported trouble buying food at some point in the last year. Shockingly, one in two infants born in Texas qualifies for the WIC program. Unfortunately, the debt-induced deflationary depression the country and the world have fallen into means there will probably be more hunger issues in the near term, not less. What’s worse is the resources to help the hungry are shrinking just when the needs are increasing.
The Texas Agricultural Commissioner said tax revenues keep falling and he anticipates state agencies will be asked to reduce spending below budgeted levels after the first of the year to compensate for an unanticipated multi-billion dollar gap. All of the other large states and most local governments are facing the same pressures. In Waco, our local food bank Caritas has 200 new families it has never seen before looking for assistance at a time when charitable donations are down. Since between now and January an additional one million people are expected to run out of all unemployment benefits it is a safe bet the number of Americans facing potential hunger is going to keep growing.
When President Obama talks about reducing the deficit he is talking about cutting funding for hunger programs at a time when all other funding sources are shrinking and the needs are growing. And, he is talking about cutting the number of people directly employed by the federal government at the same time the states and local governments are making job cuts. Effectively, when the President talks about deficit reduction in the middle of a deflationary depression he is talking about increasing the hunger pains of the American people. President Obama needs to reverse course and say deficit reduction will not be a priority of his administration unless and until the unemployment rate falls back below 7.6%, which is the rate he inherited. He should stake his Presidency on creating jobs and let the deficit be damned. The President should put forward a budget that not only meets the growing needs of the hungry and the unemployed, but also a budget that provides more aid to the states so they can close their funding gaps without further budget cuts. Most of the people concerned about the deficit are really concerned their taxes are about to go way up. The President can alleviate these fears by calling on the Fed to fulfill their mandate for full employment and to up their program of quantitative easing to a level that not only fully covers the budget deficit, but also actually reduces the national debt. He should demand they not end quantitative easing until the unemployment rate falls back below a rate of 7.6%. Mr. President, it is time for you to morph from Herbert Hoover to FDR.
