The Fed’s Price Stability Charge Requires Them to Print More Money
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on August 11, 2009
The Federal Reserve has a dual mandate; economic growth and price stability. There can be little question that the economy would benefit if the Federal Reserve increased its program of quantitative easing (printing money) at tomorrow’s meeting. But what the markets and the media are missing is that the Federal Reserve needs to print more money to maintain price stability. Price stability requires limiting the amount of inflation or deflation that impacts the purchasing power of a dollar for a domestic U.S. consumer. This should not be confused with whether the value of the dollar is rising or falling versus other currencies like the euro, the pound, or the yen. Printing money to maintain price stability will seem counter-intuitive to most observers of the markets and the economy. The knee-jerk response is usually that if the Fed prints more money we will eventually have hyper-inflation. The Federal Reserve needs to ignore the voices of ignorance at tomorrow’s meeting and follow the lead of the Bank of England and print more money, and lots of it. The reason is the U.S. economy is experiencing levels of deflation that are approaching the levels of deflation last seen in the early 1930’s during the Great Depression. Most people have missed this fact due to the use of owners’ equivalent rent in the CPI index, which dramatically understates the decline in home prices in the U.S.
The official CPI numbers state that prices fell 1.4% in the last 12 months in the U.S. The CPI currently uses owners’ equivalent rent to calculate the price of home ownership. Owner’s equivalent rent accounts for over 23% of the CPI Index. In the last 12 months this calculation has risen 1.9% and has contributed a positive .4% to annual CPI. Say WHAT? That’s right; the official CPI statistics calculate that it is more expensive to purchase a home today than it was 12 months ago in the U.S. An alternative measure of home prices is the Case/Shiller index. This index has fallen over 17% in the last 12 months and much more accurately captures the trend of the costs of purchasing a home for a U.S. consumer. If the CPI used changes in home prices in the CPI index rather than owners’ equivalent rents, then the positive .4% housing contributed to CPI in the last 12 months would actually have been a negative detraction of approximately 3.9%. This means the real rate of deflation in the U.S. over the last 12 months is 5.7%, not 1.4%. If our CPI were reported as minus 5.7% over the last 12 months, then Washington would be much more concerned about deflation.
From 1929 to 1933 the U.S. economy experienced mid single digit deflation for 4 years in a row. But the official CPI Index in the 1930’s used home prices to calculate the cost of purchasing a home for a consumer, not owner’s equivalent rent. The federal government changed the calculation for the cost of homeownership in the CPI Index in January of 1983. We will find out tomorrow if the Fed understands that deflation over the last 12 months is tracking the levels of deflation of the Great Depression. If they get it they will surprise the markets and increase the level of their quantitative easing program. If they don’t get it, then they will stand pat. The Obama Administration has already checked out on further assistance to the economy in the near term. Mr. Bernanke is our last and best hope to battle the economic crisis. My objective in detailing this is not to be value added by helping people understand and interpret the statistics they are looking at. My objective is to give all Americans a wake-up call and say we are facing a New Great Depression and we need to insist Washington takes action.
