subscribe to the RSS Feed

Friday, September 10, 2010

Ben Bernanke | Escape The New Great Depression

The Economy Cannot Grow if Credit Keeps Shrinking

Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on July 27, 2009

An analysis by the Wall Street Journal showed that the total loan portfolios of the nation’s 15 largest banks shrank by an aggregate of 2.8% in the second quarter.  Most of the lending that did occur in the quarter went to mortgage refinancing and credit renewals for existing business customers.  Less than half of the loans that were made represented new commitments by the banks representing new transactions for the economy.  The banks claim that demand remains weak from potential borrowers, and potential borrowers claim the banks have overly restrictive lending standards.  The truth is both viewpoints are true.  Many of the highest quality borrowers are looking to contract, not expand.  Meanwhile, the banks have significantly raised the bar on what it takes to qualify for a new loan, whether it is a consumer loan or a business loan.  According to the WSJ, loan portfolios at the nation’s 15 largest banks have decline by 10% from year ago levels after acquisitions are netted out.  The fact that lending is still contracting at the same pace as it did in the last couple of quarters means there is a real possibility the economy contracted at a similar pace as well.  Economists are looking for a much more benign contraction in U.S. second quarter GDP.  I would not be surprised if the number is much worse than expected, just like it was in Britain.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, in a much hyped Town Hall style meeting to be broadcast this week on the PBS News Hour program, claimed that back in 1929 and 1930 the world was experiencing a normal recession.  Then, major Central Europe lenders (Austrian Creditanstalt) faltered and further panic set in causing the Great Depression.  His thesis is that since the large “banks” have been rescued the crisis has been averted.  But we have no way of knowing if the rumors of trouble with certain banks indeed kicked off the Great Depression.  It could be that the event was just the next inevitable phase of the crisis and the back then hoped for “green shoots” of 1931 vanished.  We have built up significant hope in 2009 that the worst is behind us and blue skies are just around the corner.  However, the shrinking credit extended by our largest banks is painting a very different story.

What I think Chairman Bernanke is missing is the world of lending has changed since 1931.  Back then most of the credit extended in the economy came from commercial banks.  If the commercial banks were lost the economy would be lost with them.  However, in the 2000’s the vast majority of lending has come from the shadow banking system fueled by the asset-backed securities market.  This market is dead and as CIT can attest the shadow banking model is broken.  Yet our largest banks have not only failed to pick up the slack, they too are shrinking the credit they extend to the economy.  Perhaps the real cause of the Great Depression was the inevitable “Great Un-Ravel” (yes I just coined that term) that was destined to occur one way or another as a global economy with too much debt ran into contracting economies and deflation.  Just like early 1931, we have a global economy with massive imbalances that are still unraveling.  We just don’t know what will be the next shoe to drop.

Bernanke Fails to Build Public Support for More Economic Aid from Washington

Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on July 21, 2009

Today, Ben Bernanke felt compelled to answer his inflation hawk critics rather than ignore them.  He sought to assure everyone that the Fed has an exit strategy from its support for the economy and will pull the trigger when the time is right.  Astonishingly, he did all of this while telling Congress that the economy remains weak, the risks remain to the downside, and unemployment should continue to rise.  What Bernanke has done is box the Fed into a neutral policy of no more action one way or the other for the time being.  He is content to wait and watch to see if the policies enacted so far are enough to stabilize and revive the economy.  The Obama Administration has adopted the same watch and wait strategy.  The question going forward is what are they waiting for?  Since both the Fed and the Whitehouse have conceded that unemployment will reach 10%, will we see no more actions to aid the economy until unemployment reaches 11%? 12%?  13%?

Ben Bernanke, renowned scholar of the 1930’s great depression, missed a golden opportunity to confront his critics and declare that more needs to be done to revive the economy and that he is willing to adopt whatever policy is necessary to restore sustainable economic growth in America.  He should have built public support for more action, not less.  Instead, by tipping his hat to the need for an exit strategy he has made it much more difficult for the Fed or the Whitehouse to come forward with the next plan to revive the economy.  Those that wonder if such a plan will be necessary should consider the plight of the states.  The Financial Times is reporting the combined 2010 fiscal budget gap for the states that must be closed by spending cuts or tax increases amounts to $143 billion.  This includes the extra money the states have received from Washington in the stimulus bill to pay for some of the state’s unemployment and Medicaid costs.  The saying that as California goes so goes the country is economically ringing true right now.

The steps necessary to revive the economy will require significant public support to before they can be implemented.  Mr. Bernanke is killing support for further action.  He started talking about, and coined the term, “green shoots” this spring.  Now this summer he blinks in the face of bond vigilante and China criticism and talks about potential exit strategies.  While Chairman Bernanke has led the Fed to take unprecedented action in the post World War II era, the actions they have taken have been too little and too late.  Now, he is compounding the problem by not pounding the table and cramming quantitative easing down the bond vigilante’s throats.  Washington needs to tell the public the truth, that much more needs to be done or the economy will continue to slide.  The Ostrich strategy Washington has adopted is no strategy at all.