subscribe to the RSS Feed

Saturday, May 19, 2012

The Last Throes of Hard Money Religion

Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on December 5, 2010

We are witnessing the last throes of the idolatry of hard money.  The era of hard money officially ended when the Federal Reserve correctly decided we needed to print our way back to prosperity.  Yet few have noted the end of the era, and fewer still understand its implications, because of the wailing and knashing of teeth from the ardent disciples of hard money.  They scream hyperinflation and want to back the currency with gold.  They are confused with the concept that the federal government’s dollar resources are not finite, but infinite.  Hence, they fear deficit spending and federal debt despite the impossibility of the federal government ever defaulting on debts it owes in dollars.  Many mistakenly believe if the federal government prints money it increases rather than decreases the national debt.  Hard money religion is our historical heritage, but it is not our future, and is no longer even our present.  The sooner we can come to terms with the end of the hard money era, then the sooner we will be able to heal our self-inflicited  fiscal wounds with the new tools of the soft money era.  The hard money idolatrists are taking us down the austerity path that will break our society apart.  Society will come to its senses and exile the idolatrist to the scrap heap of history.  Ireland is about to do so because they have been asked to absorb too much pain for someone else’s gain.  It is only a matter of when we do the same here.  Since our current political leadership is comprised mostly of hard money idolatrists, including multiple priests of the religion, it will take time for change to come.

Hawaii has cut 17 school days to save money.  Yet the state has the buildings and the books, the parents want the kids to go, and the teachers want to come and teach.  How can we be sitting in the twenty first century and everyone agree we need something we already have the resources for and yet we throw up our hands and say we can’t do it?  The reason is the idolatry of hard money and the mistaken belief that dollars are a finite resource for the federal government.  All Congress has to do is pass another stimulus bill to send aid to the states, and these problems will be solved.  Yet hard money idolatry has us staring at the print button and saying we dare not touch it.  Now we are staring at the state of Arizona cutting Medicaid patients out of transplant programs to save money.  A 32 year-old father in need of a liver transplant has been removed from the waiting list because he is poor and couldn’t show up at the hospital with $200,000 in cash.  The hospital and the doctors are there, yet access is denied.  Again, federalising Medicaid would end this nonsensical atrocity.

Fortunately for us many of the priests of hard money who are railing against debts and deficits and runaway spending, such as our President and most of our Republican and Democrat Senators and Congressman, are actually false prophets and charlatans.  As politicians, they are willing to tell us anything to maintain their own base of power and the perks that come with it.  Otherwise, we would not be looking at an all-but-certain extension of all the tax cuts enacted by both President Bush and President Obama along with an extension of unpaid for unemployment benefits in the midst of trillion dollar deficits.  Most of these so-called deficit hawks are not true believers.  They simply manipulate the beliefs of others to gain votes.  When the polls change, they will change with the polls.  This is actually our saving grace.  All it will take to bring about true change is to change public opinion.  And as President Obama has found out, the public can change opinion fast. 

  • Lawrence Bagshaw said,

    Dear Mr Kamperman,

    The reason for not doing what you suggest above, ie “printing our way back to prosperity,” is that the parts of the private sector which are not burdened by debt will be adversely affected if you simply increase the supply of money without any corresponding increase in production. If we do what you suggest we risk inflation.

    It has been a guiding economic principle for centuries that debtors must pay what they owe or face liquidation. There is no moral or economic virtue in shifting debt from those who can’t afford it to those without debts who can.

    It is true that the liquidation of debts would bring about a sizeable reduction in economic output before a return to growth occurred. However your suggested remedy of money printing would risk the complete destruction of the economy via hyper-inflation.

    In terms of fiscal reality, why is it better to encourage people to borrow more than they can pay back ? If people have done with borrowing and now wish to save and pay down their debts then national income must fall until such time as people are ready to spend again. It’s a hard but simple fact. On a national view, why would we want our government to bankrupt itself by continuing trying to compensate for the spending which we ourselves do not want to make ? This only raises costs in taxation and delays the inevitable reality on a hard money view.

    Can we, should we continue to duck the hard choices which, by doing so, have brought us to this position whereby we now have to “print our way back to prosperity” ? Printing our way to prosperity even sounds wrong and when something sounds wrong, it usually is.

    Kind regards,

    Lawrence Bagshaw

  • Badtux said,

    Only a moron believes that an inflation rate of 6% (what would happen if we printed away the federal deficit) is “hyperinflation”. Yet morons we have aplenty. And some, alas, post on this blog.

home | top