Federal Reserve Fails to Foresee Deflation
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on August 31, 2010
The minutes from the Fed meeting show that no one on the Fed is worried that deflation is a significant near-term risk. No one. Some see disinflation while others still see inflation as the mostly likely outcome, but no one is forecasting deflation. In fact they are forecasting moderate growth for 2011, despite the fact the stimulus will run off in 2011 and there doesn’t appear to be a replacement stimulus bill on the horizon. The Fed is way way way behind the curve again, ala summer 2007. Deflation has already taken hold in the U.S. Deflation is a function of either over-supply or declining demand. Demand has withered for most items, most notably housing. With the expiration of the homebuyers tax credits sales of homes have plunged. How hard is it to foresee housing will remain a drag on the economy? Wages are falling substantially for those fortunate enough to replace lost jobs. What has held up the incomes of many households up until now are unemployment benefits and 401(k) plan withdrawls. Congress is not likely to extend unemployment benefits for individuals beyond 99 weeks. The large scale shedding of workers began roughly 99 weeks ago right after Lehman Brothers was turned away by the Treasury and forced to file for an unprepared bankruptcy. How hard is it to foresee household personal incomes are in trouble going forward?
The question the Fed should be concerned with is not whether the economy will fall into deflation, the question they should be debating is how soon and how forcefully do they need to act to prevent it. Like cancer, it may be too late to cure it if you wait for it to be obvious to see. Look at how Japan has struggled to shake off deflation despite near zero interest rates. Look at how the U.S. failed to shake off deflation prior to the onset of World War II. Frankly, the Fed simply doesn’t know how soon they should act, nor how forcefully. Shocking considering Bernanke is supposed to be the world’s deflation expert.
The Fed knows its only remaining weopon is printing money, which puts a bad taste in the mouths of most avowed inflation hawks. But as inflation hawk St. Louis Fed President Bullard has said, the data is coming in on the low side for inflation, not the high side. And, while he doesn’t see deflation as a probability he wants an orderly framework for how the Fed will decide when to print and how much to print. Shouldn’t this conversation have occurred under Greenspan or Volcker and shouldn’t the Fed have a manual on just what to do in this situation? The reason they don’t is the concept of deflation has seemed inconceivable to smug modern day economists who grew up in the post World War II era. This is the reason all of our econometric models only contain post World War II data. With fiscal policy frozen in Washington the only operational weopon left is monetary policy. I’m know we have waited too long to pull the trigger. So do all the 99ers. There is no doubt the Fed will print more money. The open question is do they have the guts necessary to print the trillions needed?
