Breaking up the Too-Big-to-Fail Banks Will Not Make Us Safer
Posted by Michael A. Kamperman on January 27, 2010
President Obama has decided he needs to distance himself from the Too-Big-to-Fail taxpayer bailed-out Zombie banks. Politically speaking, who can blame him? But there is a difference between campaign rhetoric and policy. The President’s is embracing former Fed Chair Paul Volcker’s quest to separate out taxpayer backed deposits from riskier strategies such as proprietary trading, private equity investments, and hedge funds. It would be nice to go back to the Glass-Steagall era, but that ship has sailed. The age of financial innocence is over and it is not coming back in our lifetime. After the disorderly Lehman Brothers bankruptcy no Treasury Secretary or Federal Reserve Chairman will allow a large financial institution to go under in a non-planned, chaotic, your on your own buddy way. Too-Big-to-Fail means that if an institution goes under it is large enough to drag multiple other institutions under with it setting off a domino effect. What the President should propose are regulations that allow the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to close financial institutions in the same way they can close FDIC insured commercial banks. The federal government needs to be able to seize all assets of an insolvent financial institution, wipe out the shareholders, and sell the assets to another institution who will guarantee the firms accounts and counter-parties.
What is disconcerting is that by embracing the Volcker position the President is indicating he doesn’t understand the root cause of the financial crisis, and therefore he doesn’t understand what needs to be done to fix it. Proprietary trading is risky, private equity is risky, and hedge fund trading strategies are risky. But none of these activities caused the credit crisis, and none of these activities create systemic risk. Systemic risk comes from a system that is too highly leveraged so that when an unforeseen crisis arises the financial institutions don’t have enough capital to ride out the storm. The cause of the current credit crisis has already been fixed. The markets fixed it. The cause of the crisis resulted from lenders being able to make loans and then sell the loans for a large profit with no ongoing risk if a loan wasn’t repaid. But the AAA rated asset-backed securities market imploded and now if you make a loan you bear the risk of that loan. Hence, the pendulum has swung from loans being too easy to get to being too hard to get.
The President needs to focus on restoring normal credit conditions to small businesses and consumers. The President should leave the structure of banks alone and simply insist they carry more capital compared to their assets and he should insist they start to lend again. Creating uncertainty is no way to encourage banks to take on the risks of new loans. Lending is more likely to happen if an institution is well diversified and can rely on profits from non-lending activities to cushion potential losses from lending activities. I can’t believe that President Obama has backed me into a corner where I have to defend the Zombie banks. What we need is lending, lending, lending rather than extending and pretending. We will not create jobs until small businesses and consumers can access capital. The President should come out in favor of creating a “bad bank” to absorb the toxic assets on the books of the banks. This is the only way to return the Zombies to the land of the living.
